Feasibility of Individualized, Model-guided Optimization of Proton Beam Treatment Planning in Patients With Low Grade Glioma (INDIGO)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05964569 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : July 28, 2023
Last Update Posted : January 5, 2024
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Low Grade Glioma | Other: model-guided optimization of treatment plan Other: standard treatment plan, no optimization | Phase 2 |
Since patients with low grade glioma are expected to become long-term survivors, the prevention of long-term sequelae is particularly important. In addition to disease progression, also treatment related side effects such as decline of neurocognitive function, endocrine impairment or sensorineural deficits can have a negative impact on patient's quality of life.
Owing to the biophysical properties of protons with an inverse depth dose profile compared to photons and a steep dose fall of to the normal tissue, there is a strong rationale for the use of PRT in the treatment of patients with low-grade glioma. Although data from large randomized trials are still missing there is increasing evidence from smaller prospective trials and retrospective analyses that the expected advantages indeed transform into clinical advantages.
However, in about 20 % of all patients, late contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBL) appear on follow-up MR images 6 - 24 months after treatment. At HIT in Heidelberg and at OncoRay in Dresden, CEBLs have been observed to occur at very distinct locations in the brain and relative to the treatment field. Retrospective analysis has elucidated potential key factors that lead to CEBL occurrence. However, avoidance of CEBLs is hardly feasible using conventional treatment planning strategies. Model-aided risk avoidance denotes the use of model-based CEBL risk calculations as an auxiliary tool for clinical treatment planning: Model-based risk calculations and risk reduction via software-based optimization help the clinician to minimize risk of CEBL occurrence during treatment planning.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 120 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | randomized, observer blind two arm (active control), parallel group |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Prospective Phase II Trial to Assess Feasibility of Individualized, Model-guided Optimization of Proton Beam Treatment Planning in Patients With Low Grade Glioma Multicentric, Prospective Interventional, Randomized, Observer Blind Two Arm (Active Control), Parallel Group Investigator-initiated Phase II Trial |
Actual Study Start Date : | November 11, 2023 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | November 11, 2026 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | November 11, 2028 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard treatment plan
Model-based NTCP is calculated after plan approval, however, no further adjustments are to be made to the approved treatment plan
|
Other: standard treatment plan, no optimization
original treatment plans are not optimized |
Experimental: Optimized treatment plan
Allocated to Control Calculation of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) Model-guided replanning. Replanning is performed with Raysearch Raystation. Optimizations objectives are:
The effectiveness of the re-planning is verified by a second NTCP computation. |
Other: model-guided optimization of treatment plan
original treatmant plans are optimized based on model-based NTCP |
- incidence of contrast enhancing brain leasions [ Time Frame: observed within 24 months after PRT measured by quarterly contrast enhanced MRI of the brain ]the cumulative incidence of contrast enhancing brain lesions
- radiation-induced brain injuries [ Time Frame: observed within 24 months after PRT measured by quarterly contrast enhanced MRI of the brain ]incidence of radiation-induced brain injuries > CTC°II
- progression-free survival [ Time Frame: observed within 24 months after PRT measured by quarterly contrast enhanced MRI of the brain ]number of surviving patients without tumor progression
- overall survival [ Time Frame: observed within 24 months after Proton Beam Therapy (PRT) measured by quarterly contrast enhanced MRI of the brain ]number of surviving patients
- patient reported outcome [ Time Frame: up to 24 months after completion of radiotherapy ]patient reported outcome according to points on the PRO-CTCAE questionaire, scored 0/1 for absent/present)
- quality of life QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: up to 24 months after completion of PRT ]scores on the QLQ-C30 questionare, scored 0 (absence) to 5 (fully present)
- quality of life QLQ-BN20 [ Time Frame: up to 24 months after completion of PRT ]scores on the QLQ-BN20 questionare, scored 0 (absence) to 5 (fully present)
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 years
- histologically proven low-grade glioma
- indication for definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy
- ability to understand character and personal consequences of the clinical trial
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous cerebral irradiation
- contraindication for contrast-enhanced MRI
- neurofibromatosis
- participation in another clinical trial with competing objectives
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05964569
Contact: Semi Harrabi, MD | +496221 56 ext 8201 | semi.harrabi@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
Contact: Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen, Phd | +496221 56 ext 8201 | adriane.lentz-hommertgen@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
Germany | |
Department of Radiotherapy, University of Heidelberg | Recruiting |
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120 | |
Contact: Juergen Debus, Prof. Dr. Dr. +49 6221 56 ext 8200 juergen.debus@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
Contact: Adriane Hommertgen, Dr. med. 0622156 ext 34091 adriane.hommertgen@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
Documents provided by Juergen Debus, University Hospital Heidelberg:
Responsible Party: | Juergen Debus, Department Head, University Hospital Heidelberg |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05964569 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
RadOnk-Indigo |
First Posted: | July 28, 2023 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | January 5, 2024 |
Last Verified: | January 2024 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Glioma Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial Neuroectodermal Tumors Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |